Lea Ma vs Salma Ewing Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L W L
Form
L W L W L W W L L LHead-To-Head: Ma 1 - 0 Ewing
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ma winning 2 and Ewing winning 0. The last match between Ma and Ewing was at the W35 Jackson, 04-04-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Lea Ma getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lea Ma | 1 |
| Salma Ewing | 0 |
W35 Jackson(04-04-2025)
6
2
6
0
| Ma | Stats | Ewing |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (10-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 380 | Ranking | 715 |
| 359 | Highest Rank | 652 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 63% (76-45) | Career Total W/L | 58% (94-69) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Lea Ma
Player
Salma Ewing
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:9:22 | Average Match Time | 1:9:22 |
| 62% (26/42) | 1st Serve % | 69% (29/42) |
| 73% (19/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/13) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (28/42) | Return Points Win % | 31% (13/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lea Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Lea Ma
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Blythe Sturman
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
33
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Lea Ma
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Lea Ma
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Salma Ewing
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Lea Ma
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Victoria Hu
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
44%
(
14 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Salma Ewing Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Salma Ewing
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
81%
(
13 of
16)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
26
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Marcella Cruz
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristina Liutova
Player
Salma Ewing
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Granwehr
Player
Salma Ewing
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Angeles Rodriguez-Rizo
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Toma
Player
Salma Ewing
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (76/45) | Win/Loss | 58% (94/69) |
| 62% (164/99) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (214/163) |
| 56% (1333/1030) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1844/1569) |
| 64% (51/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (77/52) |
| 60% (18/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (17/16) |
| 64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 278 | Aces Total | 165 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 354 |
| 1:29:1 | Average Match Time | 1:3:12 |
| 417.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.46 |
| 60% (3904/6560) | 1st Serve % | 57% (3530/6143) |
| 65% (2542/3904) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2188/3530) |
| 48% (1280/2655) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1199/2613) |
| 51% (451/891) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (383/800) |
| 47% (3303/6967) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2829/6006) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (73/43) | Challenger W/L | 48% (38/41) |
| 60% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 67% (56/28) |
| 67% (76/114) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (94/162) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (9/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (7/28) |
| 58% (14/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (26/52) |
| 90% (80/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (100/82) |
| 10% (80/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (100/18) |
| 10% (41/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (63/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
